Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Paul Laffoley has just been awarded a prestigious Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship.  Out of a group of almost 3,000 applicants the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation awards only 180 Fellowships to artists, scientists, and scholars.

Please visit for more information:

http://www.gf.org/fellows/16501-paul-laffoley

American Visionary Art Museum

Paul Laffoley was featured on the cover of the American Visionary Art Museum’s journal (February 2009).  Their show The Marriage of Art, Science & Philosophy will be on view through September 6, 2009.

For more info visit http://avam.org/exhibitions/images/MASP%20Intro%20and%20more.pdf

Unanticipated effects of Stellar Husbandry

Hi Paul, it’s Dave the fellow who met you in Toronto for your 60’s show and gave you the comic about the clock machine.
During your lecture you were talking about an aspect of the house of time that requires the creation of a neutron star as component.
My question is what do you imagine are the unanticipated effects of the stellar husbandry on the ecology of the solar system (ours or whichever one plays the petri dish)?

Here are a few of my own thoughts on this:
All the celestial phenomenon in the area are effecting each other and have probably reached some kind of an equilibrium, but I am thinking that by creating some new celestial phenomenon from scratch, transmuting one into another (a star into a sun) , or just milking a star for energy, that must upset the balance in some way which causes some kind of cascade effect. One direction I have been thinking about the effects of such technology is on the human psychic level. Celestial phenomenon can exert certain effects on our consciousness, solar flares, planetary alignments, etc) a new celestial event in the solar system may have some unanticipated psychic effects as humans are bombarded by different ratios of energy.

A more humorous side tangent is how we could develop totally man made zodiac houses by stellar husbandry cultivated constellations. Perhaps the science of star creation effects on the human electromagnetic organ in the future is perfected in ways that cultures can anticipate what celestial phenomenon where (or near what, or in combo with) will cause this effect on human behavior: a paint by stars programmable planetary culture.

Another direction I thought about is how the vacuum of outer may be an ecosystem lush in life. Perhaps there are life forms that seem to us to be just a bunch of space radiation, who knows dark matter could even be something comparable to algae in the ocean? If hypothetically there exist such life then the solar systems current configuration is the homeostasis for this life. One possible problem I can imagine occurring is if for a specific device (such as the house of time) a star with a very specific energy output is to be created, then when the star is born it may change unpredictably over time, baffling technicians, as unknown life forms begin to discover this new niche as a food source, a nesting material, who knows maybe even an aphrodisiac.
Another problem I can imagine is that by changing the solar ecosystem it may cause some life to die out and others to grow wildly and that may have some kind of terrible effect, who knows, a life form that may have been on the menu of some other species that starved to death can now eat our ionosphere freely.

I guess my question turned more into a rant but I figured you may find some of it interesting.

~Dave

I don’t know what the subject is…

Paul,

You were first made known to me through a DisinfoTV dvd given to me by a friend. I was amazed at the beauty and complexity of your work and what it represented for humanity. Your name pops up as I read this and that on the WorldWideWeb, almost synchronistically it seems. And today is no exception as it is Inauguration Day in the United States. I have no political ideology to speak of and while I’m not suspicious of Obama in the conspiracy theory sense, I can’t seem to jump on the bandwagon. I can’t imagine that the so-called “regime change” happening is really going to be all that different from what has come before. People being what they are seem to get hyper-excited about the next new thing and then move on to the next one. It’s like the attacks on September 11, 2001 (which I refuse to refer to in the short code which everyone else seems to favor) where “everything changed and the world changed and nothing would be the same”. And the newspapers cut out the sports sections temporarily and the sports writers wrote thoughtful articles questioning what is “important”. But now, almost 8 years later, things have gone back to “normal”; sports are still a national obsession, the flags are back in the basements or closets, and one day “Patriot Day”, as it’s now called, will be just another holiday in the vein of “Presidents Day”. A day that will have a retail sale named after it. I try to extricate my self from the frenzy of pop culture and the cult of celebrity and try to focus on spiritual and philosophical concerns, and I want to feel hope for a better future, but as I am currently unemployed in the convential sense that I have no incoming monetary sustenance I feel depressed and hopeless. I tend to read about esoteric things and have read conspiracy theory so I wonder about a “big picture” sort of thing. And I want life on earth to be free and exciting for everyone, but can’t imagine it being any different from the way it’s been for the last few hundred years. Many discoveries and advances have been made, but at the same time we have made steps backwards in terms of civil rights and religious superstition. It seems that there is only the illusion of progress and that the human race is standing still and not really moving forward, in terms of social change and cultural change in the arts. So I guess my questions, and I’m not exactly sure why I’m writing to you, is what am supposed to do to make things “better”? Or is it all true and that we are prisoners of alien overlords or are we simply doomed to the repetition of slavery for all time, in a Nietzschean “Eternal Return”?

Paul Laffoley: The Sixties, Opening January 8, 2009, Kent Gallery, New York

PAUL LAFFOLEY: THE SIXTIES

OPENING RECEPTION, January 8, 6-8pm
with musical performance by Prince Rama of Ayodhya

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

In 2005, Paul Laffoley was served with an eviction notice from his studio premises of 38 years and the home of the Boston Visionary Cell. While the event was traumatic at the time, there were two positive developments that came about as a result of the forced relocation. First, he found a superior studio for the same rent AND the contents of the Cell could, for the first time, be fully inventoried and inspected for condition. Many of the works had been in storage at the Bromfield studio since Christmas, 1968 when Laffoley moved into a former utility room in downtown Boston. In the process of cleaning, restoring and photographing these early works for the upcoming catalogue raisonne, we realized it would be an excellent opportunity to finally present these early works in an exhibition format.
Therefore, it is with great pleasure that we present 10 paintings by Paul Laffoley realized between the years of 1965 and 1969.

Following a formal education from Brown in the classics, and architectural studies at Harvard, Laffoley would begin to assimilate and systematically cross-pollinate his related strands of intellectual inquiry. Following his suggestion that bridges be constructed between the two towers for safety, he was summarily fired by Yamasaki and returned to Boston. At that time, Laffoley had been painting in the basement of his family’s home completing what may be his first fully mature vision with The Cosmos Falls into the Chaos as Shakti Urborosi: the Elimination of Value Systems by Spectrum Analysis, 1965. From this point forward, Laffoley

began to formulate his unique painterly and informational approach to the two-dimensional surface.

Clearly devoting himself to painting by the mid sixties, he began a highly original approach based on extensive hand written journals documenting his research, diagrams, and footnoted predecessors to various theoretical developments. Laffoley first began to organize his ideas in a format related to eastern mandalas that embraced his interests in the spiritual. This quickly developed into three sub-groupings of work: Operating Systems, Psychotronic Devices, and their related Lucid Dreams. Conceived of as “structured singularities”, Laffoley never worked in series, but rather approached each project as a unique construct. Working in a solitary lifestyle, each 73 ½ x 73 ½ inch canvas would take one to three years to paint and code. By the late 1980’s, Laffoley began to move from the spiritual and the intellectual, and evolved to the view of his work as an interactive, physically engaging Psychotronic devices, a modern approach to trans-disciplinary enlightenment and its spiritual aura.

PAUL LAFFOLEY: THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF REVELATION

This book of the artist’s writings recounts a pivotal dream that Laffoley had in 1961. Since that time, Laffoley’s work has been a constant, interdisciplinary quest to explore the structure, and mystery of knowledge and transcendence. His dense diagrammatic paintings bring together philosophy, history, science and the meaning and power of symbols. Edited by Jeanne Marie Wasilik. ISBN# 1878607057
Clothbound. 112 pp., 8 color plates, 56 black and white illustrations from popular culture.

Other exhibitions of works by Laffoley have been Structured Singularities (1989), Portaling (1997) Time Phase X (2005) Mind Physics (2006) In 1999, Laffoley had his first museum retrospective and second monograph entitled:

Paul Laffoley. Architectonic Thought-Forms: Gedankenexperiemente in Zombie Aesthetics, A Survey of the Visionary Art of Paul Laffoley Spanning Four Decades, 1967-1999, to the Brink of the Bauharoque. Texts by Elizabeth Ferrer, J.W. Mahoney, Paul Laffoley and Jeanne Marie Wasilik. Austin Museum of Art, 1999.

Currently on View – Paul Laffoley: The Sixties, Meta Gallery, Toronto

Paul Laffoley: The Sixties

Meta Gallery, Toronto

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Toronto, Canada, November 17, 2008-Meta Gallery is pleased to present The Sixties, an exhibition of works on canvas and paper by celebrated visionary artist Paul Laffoley. In this, his first show with the gallery, as well as his first ever solo exhibition in Canada, 10 works will be displayed, all executed between 1964 and 1973. In what would end up being the precursor to a clearly defined compositional stye, these early works represent the artist’s experiments with a range of aesthetic expressions to come to what some have referred to as “an authentic new artform”.

Utilizing an architecturally informed, highly graphic and diagramatical process the artist creates what he refers to as “taking cosmic themes and turning them into highly detailed earthworks”. Each painting, which can take up to 3 years to create, takes the viewer deep on a journey through the complexity of his visions, detailing abstract theories, futuristic devices and prophetic glimpses into the future where a vegetable house grown from a single bag of seeds in 3 months would solve the world’s housing shortage. In another, the definition of time travel is fulfilled by amplifying events of retro-cognition of the past and pre-cognition of the future through a device call a Geochronmechane. 

Common themes throughout the artist’s work are operating systems, embedded with information and connected in ways not previously considered. Most often the symbolism presented in Paul’s work is mediated by a system of text which connects disciplines as diverse as astrology, metaphysics, history, dimensionality, architecture, chemistry and biology to name but a few.

Through the arrangement and presentation within the works, an entirely new worldview unfolds, and one which is further brought into being by experiencing the works themselves. Laffoley considers many of his paintings to be ‘psychotronic’, or mass-consciousness interactive, meaning that rather than the painting representing an extraneous invention or idea, the painting is the thing itself.

Paul Laffoley was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1940 and has been working and living in Boston since 1966. Following his graduation from Brown with a degree in the Classics he attended the Harvard Graduate School of Design from 1962-1963. After being dismissed for conceptual deviance he apprenticed with the visionary architect Frederick Kiesler in New York before returning to Massachusetts in 1965. Later that year he began painting in the style he is known for today in his parents basement in Belmont and in 1968 moved into what would become his home and studio for the next 40 years. This 18 x 30 foot utility room on the second floor of a downtown office building in Boston at 36 Broomfield St. was dubbed the Boston Visionary Cell. It was incorporated in 1971 as a non-profit art association encouraging art and architecture of the visionary genre. Since 1966 Laffoley has shown in over 200 exhibitions as well as four major exhibitions in New York at Kent Gallery entitled Singularities (1989), Portalling (1997), Time Phase X (2005) and Mind Physics (2007). In 1989, Kent Gallery published the first monograph on his work entitled The Phenomenology of Revelation. His second publication, entitled Architectonic Thought-Forms: Gedankenexperiemente in Zombie Aesthetics, A Survey of the Visionary Art of Paul Laffoley Spanning Four Decades, 1967-1999, to the Brink of the Bauharouque was a result of his first museum retrospective at the Austin Museum of Art in 1999. A catalogue raisonne of the artist’s complete works is currently in progress. 

The Sixties will be on view from November 29 to January 4, 2009. Gallery hours are Tuesday through Saturday from 11-6 and Sunday from 12-5. The opening reception will be on November 29 from 7-10pm. Paul will also be giving a lecture on his art and life on Sunday November 30 from 5-8pm at the Young Centre for the Performing Arts.

For additional information please contact Meiko Kanamoto at 416.955.0500 or mk@metagallery.com.

Walt Disney and Josef Albers

Question:
Dear Mr. Laffoley,
I am writing to you to inquire as to whether you would be willing to tell me the story pertaining to the connections and history of Walt Disney’s connection to Josef Albers. Miles Huston told me a story that he said originated with you regarding Walt Disney and his infatuation with the Black Mountain College and the clique surrounding Josef Albers. I have been very interested in the subject matter and would love to hear what you have to say.

Thank you, Anais

Dear Anais,
In 1933, when Black Mountain College opened in Asheville, North Carolina, its artistic director was Josef Albers (1888-1972) the last head of the Bauhaus before the Nazis closed it. The contract for Albers and his wife Anni was offered by the American architect Philip Johnson (1906-2005). By 1935 Walt Disney (1908-1966) got wind of what was up. He rushed to get an interview with Albers explaining that no one had understood so far the artistic implications of the new field of animation. When they met Albers was not amused with Disney’s vision of cute nature. The meeting ended with Albers blowing up saying, “I will not allow any American kitsch to infect the minds of ‘my’ students.”

Disney was astonished but not deterred from his mission. He sensed, however, that Albers’ “will to power” was more sexual and mature than his, which was more neurasthenic and analytic. The comparison made Disney angry. Pretending to leave, he began to question the students away from the watchful eyes of Albers, about the nature of their life at school and who their teachers were. At that moment Disney began to realize just how much he disliked the European attitude of paternalism, which he had just experienced close up. He did, however, discover the way the students “escaped” from the school in the summer. They all went to Chihuahua in Northern Mexico. There the students would eat wild peyote derived from the buttons of the mescal cactus. In its refined form it is mescaline- the hallucinatory crystalline alkaloid: C11H17NO3. The students would, of course, look forward to the summer hiatus, not realizing that the faculty was secretly fostering their use of peyote because of its antispasmodic capabilities. Most of the European faculty knew that sensitive Americans were not used to being taught by artistic tyrants like Josef Albers, Walter Gropius (1883-1969) or Adolf Hitler (1889-1945).

By 1936 Disney was taking mescaline on a regular basis and as a result his most famous work appeared: “Fantasia.” In 1940 it became a staple of American cinema, the year it was launched. While “Fantasia” appealed immediately to children, its adult understanding did not develop until the mid-60’s, years after Black Mountain College ceased to exist. What happened, of course, was that the hippie generation (the cultural grandchild of “Wander Vogels”-“The Wandering Birds”- the German youth after World War I, in a disenfranchised state) was the first group to recognize “Fantasia” as the first American “stoner movie.” What was still not understood was that the entire ensemble was also a vicious satire in the tradition of Jonathan Swift (1667-1745) or Francois-Marie Voltare (1694-1778).

The structure of “Fantasia” consists of eight pieces of fairly well known European musical compositions, spanning the years from the 18th century to the early 20th century. Disney, himself, had never natured musically as his audiences never had, thus allowing him to work his animation to all ultimate degree. In fact what he did to “The Rite of Spring” was considered by the composer Igor Stravinsky (1882-1971) to be deemed unforgivable. To these compositions Disney juxtaposed his own animations which acted as programmed literary synesthetic visuals, very much in the vein of the hallucinations one might experience from advanced and compulsive alcoholism, such as seeing “pink elephants.”

November 13, 1940 in New York City “Fantasia” began without opening credits or logos, just the master of ceremonies Deems Taylor delivering a short introduction to the film and about the conductor Leopold Stokowski (1882-1977) who was the director of the Philadelphia orchestra. It turned out that Stokowski (an English born American) became the “bridge” Disney was “unconsciously” looking for. During the meeting of Disney with Albers, Albers began to express the traditional “put down” of Americans in relation to culture meaning “Americans have no culture.” So when Disney in 1938 started his attack on Black Mountain College and its teachers he chose “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” which is a medieval fairy tale that had been rendered into a poem by Johann Von Goethe (1749-1832) the great German poet and dramatist. Goethe called it “Der Zauber Lehrling.”  From the poem the composer Paul Dukas (1865-1935) made the tale into a concert piece.  Since “The Sorcer’s Apprentice” was first, all Disney was planning to do.  The story was of German orgin.  He first heard it played in The Hollywood Bowl and it seemed to fit the bill. Disney bought the rights to the music and actually identified completely with the story. The German sorcerer was, on the one hand, Albers, but, on the other had, he was also the superego or the father-figure of Disney. In fact the sorcerer was named “Yen Sid” (or Disney spelled backwards). Mickey Mouse was cast as “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.” Mickey was the alter ego of Disney. In fact Disney used his own squeaky voice for the voice of Mickey. While progress on the film went well, in fact it went too well. Since the cost reached $125,000, Disney figured it would never pay if it was released as a single film. Then a surprise happened. He ran into Stokowski at “The Brown Derby.” While talking over lunch, Stokowski heard the whole sad vengeful take of the confrontation between Disney and Albers. Stokowski said “I like what you are doing, and I will conduct ‘The Sorcerer’s Apprentice’ for nothing. In fact I will put up the ante on that pompous ass, Albers, who was already to join the Nazi party just as the S.S. officials shut down the Bauhaus. He was planning to imitate the architect Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe (1886-1969) who was pulled out of Germany by Philip Johnson, the same thing that was done for Albers.”

But then Stokowski’s mood lightened as he formed the idea that would become “Fantasia.” Even the name came from the famed conductor. “Fantasia” is an Italian word from about 1724 that means a free musical composition that dominates any programmatic implications that might be associated with it. In other words it is the inverse of programmatic music. The only artist that attempted this was Vassily Kandinsky (1866-1944) the Russian painter that tried to paint without making conscious representation. Such a task is, of course, impossible, as the symbolists demonstrated at the end of the 19th century. One of his plays (Yellow Sound) written in 1912 and based on contemporary theories of the relationship between color and music which was influenced by occultism, and therefore, what Disney wanted was the complete equivalent. This was realized in 1940 when Albers saw Disney’s “Concert Film” for the first time. And it made Albers extremely angry, because he knew Disney as Stokowski produced a product that would challenge the ideology of European “abstraction” over American “representation.” Albers did not care about the general American public, he was only interested in the reaction of his American students, which were becoming more negative to his methods of teaching, month by month. After the day sessions spent doing “abstractions” at night the students would stay up in their bunk houses drawing and painting from nature. When Albers discovered what was going on, he ordered the students back to the dining hall for more “abstract” lessons until they fell exhausted onto the floor of the refectory to sleep.

Disney for the climax of “Fantasia” chose the work of modest Mussorgsky (1839-1881) the Russian composer known as one of the “five” and that of the Franz Schubert (1797-1828) the Austrian composer. Mussorgsky’s tone poem “St. John’s Night on Bald Mountain” is seamlessly woven with Schubert’s rendition of the prayer “Ave Maria.” The two pieces form the seventh and eight aspects of “Fantasia,” and put, evil against good, dark against light, death against life. As a terrifying and dramatic celebration of evil, the black god Chernobog (Wormwood) (from Slavic mythology) awakens on top of Bald Mountain to be one model of “Batman.” It is Walpurgis Nights (from the English saint Walburga, A.D. 779 – the eve of May Day), the night witches ride to their appointed rendezvous. Chernobog summons ghosts, demons, skeletons, witches, dragons, goblins and zombies from a nearby cemetery. This is an exact reference to Albers’ attitude toward his students. Chernobog-Albers summons fire and lava in order to make his charges dance and fly around him, much to his delight, before he destroys them. During the sequence handfuls of demons are held a loft and they transformed first into naked women, then into demonic animals before being dropped into hot lava, with lustful smiles. The sequence is in reality a premonition by Disney of an event that took place at Black Mountain College in the mid 1940’s. When he was 63, Fernand Le’ger (1881-1955) wrote to Lawrence Kocher about the possibility of a teaching position. When he came for a visit, Le’ger gave lectures in French about the relation of architecture to painting, and gave a demonstration of the “ballet mecanique” film. Since he was such a big star in the cubist movement they gave him a run of the place, and the inevitable occurred. One day he decided to accompany the women into their shower room, “sketching under the guise of being an artist.” At the same time he started pinching and flirting with these naked wet women until one day they wised up to the fact that “this old geezer” was actually a sexist perv. They suddenly turned the showers on him. He left the school while declining the invitation to teach. Without warning the day light of the morning and the church bells began to diminish the power Chernobog as he went into hiding under his wings. While hooded figures with glowing candles moved in a silent procession as the chords of “Ave Maria” begin to fill the forest as the pilgrims enter a beautiful pasture just before dawn. With the first light the blue sky and the floating clouds give the audience a vision of Heaven on Earth.

I will not comment at this time on the other five set pieces that constitute “Fantasia,” except to say that at the end of “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” which Disney expected to be his only weapon of choice against Albers, Stokowski and Mickey Mouse meet as shadows, shake hands and congratulate each other. This scene seems to make no sense in the continuity of “Fantasia.” It was to act as the finale of Disney’s efforts to get back at “Black Mountain” college until he realized that “Black Mountain” was “Bald Mountain.” And the shadow meeting was the “bridge” between fantasy and reality, so that both entities can be experienced as ontically equivalent, giving credence to the principles of prayer, meditation, and magic. Of course, Disney knew this from his previous work that this was true.

In the end, therefore, Albers left B.M.C. in 1955, one year before the school failed, to become the chairman of the design department at Yale University. Disney, however, went on to found his self-styled cultural empire free of Eurocentric pretentiousness.

- Paul Laffoley November 20, 2008

Three Secrets of Fatima/Thanaton III

Question:
Hey Paul, What’s the ‘other information’ you have that you don’t disclose in this work [Thanaton III], and is there anywhere I can read/look at it? – Steve

Dear Steve,
On June 24 1947, a civilian pilot, Kenneth Arnold, owner of a fire-control equipment company in Boise, Idaho, took off in a small plane from the Chehalis Airport in Washington State at 3:00pm trying to search for a Marine C-46 transport that had crashed somewhere in the Cascade Mountain range. Suddenly he saw very large disk-like objects flying in echelon formation. That was 61 years ago. 30 years earlier in 1917 in a small village in the middle of Portugal, 3 peasant girls claimed to have seen “the virgin of the rosary”. There were 3 secrets of Fatima. The third secret was never revealed (until now).

Meanwhile back in 1947 in “Area 51” [a military base in the southern portion of the state of Nevada] where the most secret military base exists. It has become the focus of the finest of the UFO conspiracy theories. In it (it is said) exists such ideas as: 1. Examples of extraterrestrial reversed engineering; 2. The minutes of actual meetings with extraterrestrial; 3. Exotic energy weapons; 4. The means of weather control; 5. Ways of obverting meteors from hitting earth; 6. Methods of time travel and teleportation technology; 7. Exotic propulsion systems; 8. The development of a one-world government [to be called “The Majestic Twelve Organization”].

Today the New Democratic presidential administration is now ready to reveal to the world exactly what the extraterrestrials have in mind for the Earth which is an all out war with Earth. This will have the effect of uniting all the peoples of the World. What the extraterrestrials have in mind and this current information constitutes the third secret of Fatima.

- Paul